Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Privacy Awareness Week 2011

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

Cooper Mills Lawyers is once again proud to partner with the The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner to promote Privacy Awareness Week 2011.

Privacy Awareness Week was launched today, with the aim of encouraging people to exercise their privacy rights and to take steps to make sure their personal information is handled in accordance with the law.

As part of Privacy Awareness Week, The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has timetabled a week of events as follows:

 

Monday 2 May

  • Launch of Privacy Awareness Week, including launch of Asia Pacific Privacy Authorities social networking and privacy survey and animation
  • Australian Privacy Commissioner Timothy Pilgrim speaks with Deborah Cameron 702ABC Sydney
  • Australian Privacy Commissioner Timothy Pilgrim will join Victorian Privacy Commissioner Helen Versey at an event to discuss the use and disclosure of personal and health information, e-health and service delivery reform at the Victorian Department of Human Services. This presentation will be filmed and screened at regional offices in Geelong and Wangaratta during Privacy Awareness Week.

Tuesday 3 May

  • Australian Information Commissioner Professor John McMillan will launch Information Awareness Month 2011, a collaborative event between various bodies within the records, archives, library, knowledge, information and data management communities and now in its sixth year. The theme for IAM 2011 is Information overload: Finding the tree in the digital forest. Professor McMillan will also discuss Privacy Awareness Week.
  • Launch of 2011 privacy case notes

Wednesday 4 May

  • Australian Privacy Commissioner Timothy Pilgrim will speak about privacy issues relating to marketers in new online channels including collection of personal information from public sources and online behavioural advertising at a Privacy Awareness Week cocktail event hosted by the Australian Direct Marketing Association (ADMA)
  • Launch of online behavioural advertising FAQs

Thursday 5 May

  • Australian Information Commissioner Professor McMillan will address staff from the Department of Human Services about protecting privacy rights, handling personal information and Australian privacy law reform

Friday 5 May

  • Privacy Awareness Week 2011 wrap up
Share

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in General, IT Law, Privacy, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Business Sales – what to watch out for

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

Business sales are part of most succession plans, and getting it right can make the world of difference. Most small business owners engage the services of a licensed real estate agent or licensed business broker.

This is usually the first and only dealing with a business broker or agent. Key issues that you should consider when dealing with a business broker / agent:

Term of Appointment

All contracts with business brokers and agents will have a minimum period of appointment, with an additional period called a continuing period after this time. You should consider appointing an agent for a set period with no additional or continuing period, this will make your agent work harder and will help you avoid being locked into a relationship which isn’t working.

Commissions

Business brokers and agents almost always charge their commission on a variable basis, for example 5% of the sale price, but often charge additional fees / charges. You should be clear to find out, before signing an agreement, whether this is the total of the agent or business broker’s fee, or whether there are additional advertising and retainer fees payable. If you don’t ask this question, it can be a costly mistake.

Remember, you can negotiate, you may offer a lower commission with an incentive payment where the broker/agent achieves target sale price – it pays to shop around. It’s not always about the commission, do your research, to make sure the agent you pick is selling.

Contracts

Finally when you find a buyer and the deal is ready to be done, you need to sign a contract of sale of business (and in some cases a share sale agreement). Many business brokers and agents use a standard form document, while these documents are generally suitable for a very small number of businesses, they can’t always address the complexities of each individual sale. You should never rely on a business broker or agent to prepare a contract for you, lawyers commonly see a number of mistakes that business brokers and agents make, for example:

1. changes to the standard form contracts, which can lead to unintended consequences;

2. in most cases special conditions need to be drafted, business brokers and agents are not lawyers, they do not understand the legal complexities of contracts and are not qualified to draft special conditions – lawyers have seen many examples of poorly drafted clauses which have the reverse legal effect to what was intended;

3. clients can suffer severe tax consequences as a consequence of contracts that do not properly consider tax and corporate planning issues.

Before you sell your business you should always speak to your lawyers and accountants to obtain the right advice – and before you appoint and broker/agent do your homework.

Share

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in General, Uncategorized | Comments Off

More Posts Coming Soon

Tuesday, December 7th, 2010

We have more IT Law, Domain Law and Telecommunications Law posts coming soon.

Watch this space.

Share

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Domain law and domaining, General, ISP and Telco Law, IT Law, Podcasts, Privacy, Spam, Trade Practices Law, Uncategorized | Comments Off

ACMA to review numbering plan

Monday, October 25th, 2010

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has launched an issues paper, to examine whether the numbering plan and the way telephone numbers are used remain appropriate.

The increasing use of voice over IP (VOIP) and mobile telephones have forced a rethink on telephone numbering.

In announcing the launch of the issues paper, the ACMA Chairman Chris Chapman said:

While the existing Numbering Plan has served Australia extremely well, it is now starting to fray around the edges. Many of its features date back well over ten years, during which time there has been tremendous change in the telecommunications and broadband market.

The ACMA has called for comments on the issues paper by 3 December 2010.

The issues paper is available from the ACMA website here.

Share

Tags: , ,
Posted in General, ISP and Telco Law, IT Law, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Fixed Line Wholesale Pricing Under Review

Saturday, September 18th, 2010

The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) has released a draft report into the pricing model of fixed line telephony services, proposing radical price reductions, which is likely to see Telstra’s fixed line revenues fall even further.

The ACCC has suggested a move away from the traditional wholesale pricing model based Retail Price less Retail Cost, instead the ACCC has suggested an alternative model:

The ACCC has used a building block pricing model (also known as a regulated asset base, or “RAB” model), which calculates prices based on the assets and costs associated with providing the regulated services. It is consistent with the ACCC’s approach in other regulated industries. All submissions received in response to the ACCC’s December discussion paper supported such an approach.

The new model has suggested an across the board charge of $20 per month for line rental down from the two consumer and business rates that exist, while the ACCC has suggested a reduction of wholesale local call costs from 17c to 7c, a massive drop, which is likely to anger Telstra. Below we have extracted the draft pricing for the period 2011 to 2014:

Draft indicative prices

For ULLS services, the Bands relate to different geographical areas.

  • Band 2 covers non-CBD metropolitan areas, where approximately 70 per cent of Australia’s population live.
  • Band 4 price for more remote areas is notional, as there is very little demand, significant technological limitations on the copper and no reliable information on which to determine a price using the ACCC’s model. In June 2010, there were only about 144 active ULLS services in Band 4 compared to over 690,000 active ULLS services across Bands 1, 2 and 3.
Summary—Current indicative prices compared with proposed draft indicative prices to apply from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014
Current indicative prices Draft indicative prices
ULLS access prices with geographically de-averaged prices
Band 1 $6.60 $6.50
Band 2 $16.00 $16.00
Band 3 $31.30 $31.00
Band 4 (notional price) $100
WLR (per line per month) $25.57 (Homeline)

$26.93 (Businessline)

$20.00 (nationally averaged)
LSS (per line per month) $2.50 $2.50
PSTN OA and TA (per minute) 1c (headline rate) 1.1c (headline rate)
LCS (per call) 17c 7c
Share

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in General, ISP and Telco Law, Trade Practices Law, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Cooper Mills launches online Brand Protection Service

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

Cooper Mills is proud to announce the launch of its new Brand Protection Service, www.TM.com.au.

Cooper Mills Lawyers, one of Australia’s leading IP, and domain law expert legal practices, today launched version 1.0 of its online brand protection service portal TM.com.au, giving both local and international clients online trademark registration services, and trademark monitoring and management services.

Cooper Mills Lawyers Director Erhan Karabardak said:

In order to meet the demands of both our local and international clients we have launched our online brand protection service, which will enable our clients to effectively monitor their intellectual property all in one convenient place. This service now brings online brand protection within the reach of all local and international businesses.

Cooper Mills expects to expand the product offering and functionality of TM.com.au over the coming months.

Share

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Domain law and domaining, General, ISP and Telco Law, IT Law, Podcasts, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Chinese and .xxx domain names approved

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

The ICANN Board has just approved the release of new IDN ccTLD domain names, while at the same time allowing for the creation of the controversial .xxx domain names.

The IDN ccTLD domain names approved by ICANN are:

• CNNIC (China Internet Network Information Center)

• HKIRC (Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited)

• TWNIC (Taiwan Network Information Center).

Speaking during the ICANN 38 meeting, ICANN CEO Rod Beckstrom announced that:

One fifth of the world speaks Chinese and that means we just increased the potential online accessibility for roughly a billion people.

This announcement comes hot on the heels of the recent release of the Russian and Arabic IDN ccTLD, which we announced with great fanfare.

The contraversial .xxx domain was allowed to pass with ICANN saying:

The ICANN board also voted to allow the application for the controversial .XXX top-level domain (TLD) to move forward. The ICM registry applied for the .XXX sponsored top-level domain as a potential community site for the adult entertainment industry. The Board approved a detailed set of next steps for the application, including expedited due diligence, negotiations on a draft registry agreement, and consultation with ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee.

The .xxx domain was first mooted in 2000 as a dedicated domain for the Adult industry, but fierce debate from supporters and detractors has raged since then. In 2007 the ICANN Board rejected a proposal to progress the .xxx, but in more recent times members of the ICANN board have expressed support for it, which has resulted in its return as a prominent issue.

Members of the Adult industry had feared that while the .xxx is descriptive of their businesses, that mandatory use of this TLD would isolated Adult websites.

Share

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Domain law and domaining, General, IT Law, Uncategorized | Comments Off

ACMA determination on premium SMS restrictions

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

Consumers will have the choice of barring all premium SMS from their mobile phones as of 1 July 2010, with the latest package of measures announced by the ACMA.

The ACMA has said that the package has been created so that “…mobile users can feel confident they will only receive and pay for services they actually want”.

In a meeting with senior representatives of mobile phone companies the ACMA will discuss the possibility of the introduction of a service where consumers can request quick and easy barring via SMS.

Complaints to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman regarding premium SMS services have decreased by an astonishing rate of 50% following measures introduced by ACMA last year. As the ACMA is hoping that this trend will continue, it will be closely monitoring the industry over the next 12 months to ensure that consumer concerns are adequately being dealt with.

Recent enforceable undertakings that the ACMA has accepted from Funmobile Australia Pty Limited, which included a payment of $55 000, emphasize the ACMA’s commitment to pursuing telcos which repeatedly operate in breach of the law.

Industry has welcomed the new package as a further reinforcement of the existing suite of consumer protection measures included in the Communications Alliance Mobile Premium Services Industry Code C637:2009.

Despite both consumers and industry receiving the package with a warm welcome, the telcos will be hit hard. In a quote published by Computer World, Warren Chaisatien, research director and principle analyst at Telstyle, says that although the rule will aid consumers who have unintentionally signed up to a premium services, it is likely to have a negative impact on telco revenues as the premium SMS market was worth approximately $250 million in 2009.

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in General, ISP and Telco Law, Trade Practices Law, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Australia gets tough on cybercrime

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

Australia will strengthen its stance on cybercrime by signing the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime.

The move will see Australia join the European Union (EU), the United States, Canada, Japan and South Africa. The EU is pushing for the convention to become an international standard. Twenty-seven countries have so far signed the convention, however, more than 100 are using it to reform domestic laws.

Key points of the convention include:

  • Countries will have a representative available 24 hours a day to assist in investigations and create domestic laws.
  • The promise of greater international cooperation in fighting cybercrime.
  • The charting of criminal offences (offences against the confidentiality, integrity and availability of computer data and systems; computer-related offences including forgery and fraud; content-related offences, including child pornography; and offences related to the infringement of copyright and other related rights).

Australia’s signing of the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime follows our involvement in negotiations for the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and several national cybercrime attacks involving Federal Government websites and sites of major corporations. Signing the convention is one of many initiatives Australia is making to reduce our exposure to cybercrime and other potential cyber risks.

Share

Tags: , , ,
Posted in General, IT Law, Privacy, Spam, Uncategorized | Comments Off

ACMA issues landmark proceedings

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

In a landmark move, the ACMA has for the first time brought an action in the Federal Court  against Telco GoTalk for an alleged breaches of the Do Not Call Register Act 2006.

The ACMA alleges that GoTalk via its two offshore calls centres called 40,000 numbers contained on the Do Not Call Register.

Breaches of this kind have proven to be costly for infringing companies in the past, with Dodo Australia being issued a fine of $147 400 in 2008 for its call centres ringing 67 de-listed Australian phone numbers.

This isn’t the first sign of trouble for GoTalk. Last year the company accepted undertakings by the ACCC to record telemarketing calls and to monitor conversations at random to ensure compliance with the TPA, in response to allegations that its offshore call centres had misrepresented information to consumers, including pricing and terms and conditions.

The matter is listed for directions on 29 March 2010 in the Federal Court in Sydney.

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in General, ISP and Telco Law, Spam, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Home | About us | Our expertise | Latest News/Articles | Links | Contact us | Testimonials | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Comments (RSS) | Entries (RSS)

Copyright © 2007 All rights reserved