Posts Tagged ‘Twitter’

Court allows service by Twitter

Friday, December 24th, 2010

In what is believed to be an Australian first, the Federal Court of Australia has allowed service of legal proceedings by Twitter.

Justice Marshall of the Federal Court, sitting in Melbourne, directed that a 17 year old girl, who has been the centre of attention in the ‘nude photo’ proceedings brought by football player Sam Gilbert, be served with a copy of an injunction by email and by twitter. In his Order, His Honour Justice Marshall said:

Notwithstanding the provisions the rules of O37 r2, the Applicant have leave to serve this order on the First Respondent by sending a copy of the order to the First Respondent by email at the address [email address suppressed in this blog post] and posting a copy of the order on Twitter addressed to the First Respondent at the Twitter account its [account name suppressed in this blog post] together with notice that an email containing the order has been sent to the First Respondent.

In an interlocutory hearing scheduled for 2:15pm 24 December 2010, the Applicant, Mr Gilbert, is seeking the following relief from the Court:

(a)        The First Respondent forthwith delete permanently and destroy all copies of the Photographs or any other photograph, image or video sourced from the computer of the Applicant which is in her custody, possession or power, whether in printed or electronic format and including without limitation copies stored on an internet account or website, computer hard drive, memory stick, mp3 device, camera, phone or in any other electronic repository or format.

(b)        Within 14 days after service of this order, the First Respondent make, file and serve an affidavit deposing to the steps taken to comply with the foregoing herein.

Earlier this year an Australian Court allowed service of proceedings via social networking site Facebook.

Typically these unusual methods of service are referred to as  ‘substituted service’, where a person cannot be served through traditional means such as by post or personal, as they cannot be located or are avoiding service. All Australian Courts have broad powers allowing substituted service.

Share

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Domain law and domaining, General, IT Law, Privacy | Comments Off

Court allows Twitter

Monday, October 19th, 2009

In a report published by The Australian, it has been revealed that journalists have been using microblogging tool Twitter to provide live updates on the iiNet Case being heard before the Federal Court in Sydney.

According to The Australian, Justice Cowdrey said:

On the basis that Twittering does not distract or interfere with the conduct of my court, I personally have no objection to its use. I believe that the public has a legitimate right to be fully informed of proceedings, particularly proceedings such as (the iiNet case) which have attracted considerable public interest. Twittering can serve to inform the public in a more speedy and comprehensive manner than may be possible through traditional media coverage.

Ordinarily any form of recording device such as a video camera or tape recorder is prohibited in a Court, however, there are times where Judges will all the use of such devices.

This appears to be the first time where a Court has specifically addressed the issue of Twitter use within a Court room.

According to IT Lawyer and Cooper Mills Lawyers Principal, Erhan Karabardak:

This will not come as a surprise to many lawyers, who use laptops with wireless internet to send emails from within the Court during a proceeding.

Share

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in General, IT Law | Comments Off

Home | About us | Our expertise | Latest News/Articles | Links | Contact us | Testimonials | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Comments (RSS) | Entries (RSS)

Copyright © 2007 All rights reserved